The positioning of the office building helped the architects create a sensitive and intelligent solution: they were able to harmonize two former urban architecture concepts and compositions previously conflicting with and non-reflective to each other. The mass of one wing continues the rhythm of the blocks of flats lined up on the edge of Irinyi utca, while the delicate arch of the other wing’s end façade is adapted to the evocation of a once-imagined city gate. The design, which apparently refers to the architecture of Le Corbusier (cf. Pavillon Suisse, 1930-33), sometimes turns into mere formalism. Even if the modernity and appropriateness of this starting point is questionable, the unified, consistently designed architectural and aesthetic program works beyond debate. The interiors repeat the problematic issues of the last decade’s office building architecture. There was only a limited opportunity (mostly through the choice of finishes and materials) to make the originality declared on the building’s exterior appear in the interiors as well. However, it can be stated in general that a high-quality office building was created, being much more sensitive and wittier than the average level. In addition, it also gave a satisfactory answer to a previously open and unsolved urban architecture question.